How BlackRock And The Rest Of The ‘Climate Cartel’ Stacked Exxon’s Board With Fossil Fuel Haters
The Big Three used the power they derive from investing other people's money to force compliance with a radical political goal.
Andrew Forrest, an Australian billionaire environmentalist, is quietly funding litigation in the United States targeting ExxonMobil, an oil company whose ventures directly compete with his business, according to federal disclosures reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.
The post Foreign Billionaire Is Behind Legal Effort To Take Down ExxonMobil, Disclosures Show appeared first on .
Exxon Mobil will no longer allow its offices to fly flags expressing adherence to or membership of “outside organizations” on company flagpoles, the New York Times reported.
The new policy, which prevents employees from hanging LGBT+ pride and BLM flags on the flagpoles on company premises, is angering some of Exxon Mobil’s employees who in the past have flown gay pride flags outside of Exxon Mobil offices.
Exxon Mobil will only be allowing governmental, company, and employee resource group (ERG) flags to fly outside of its facilities. The Times said that ERGs are “employee-led affinity organizations that are generally blessed by employers.”
ERG flags that celebrate certain group identities may still be flown on company premises during months that coincide with those group identities.
Tracey Gunnlaugsson, vice president of human resources at Exxon Mobil, said, “It’s a longstanding practice at our facilities around the world that E.R.G. flags can be flown during signature months. The flags are directly related to our business and company support of our E.R.G.s.”
For instance, the company’s ERG logo for LGBT+ employees features bubbles filled with several colors around the word “PRIDE.” This logo has been flown at Exxon Mobil offices and is used on T-shirts that employees wear during gay pride parades.
J. Chris Martin, a former employee of Exxon Mobil, who previously had led the LGBT+ ERG group said that a different flag that featured the Exxon Mobil on a rainbow background “was flown at many company locations last year without question” and that he had been told that his ability to display this flag had been revoked “without explanation.”
Martin said, “I’m also told that the employee resource groups were consulted only in a perfunctory way regarding this matter, based on momentary discomfort with displaying a symbol of open-mindedness and support for long suppressed voices.”
He added, "While they may say nobody has lost anything, the symbolism is unmistakable.”
The Human Rights Campaign, a leftist organization that advocates for the LGBT+ agenda under the guise of civil rights activism, lambasted Exxon Mobil’s policy. The group said, “There’s no such thing as ‘neutrality’ when it comes to our rights. Our flag isn’t just a visual representation of our identities. It is also a staple of allyship.”
We support the LGBTQ+ employees at Exxon and hope Exxon\u2019s leaders understand there\u2019s no such thing as \u201cneutrality\u201d when it comes to our rights. Our flag isn't just a visual representation of our identities. It is also a staple of allyship.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-22/exxon-triggers-employee-backlash-with-rainbow-pride-flag-ban\u00a0\u2026— Human Rights Campaign (@Human Rights Campaign) 1650659402
The Human Rights Campaign has also aggressively come out against Florida’s Parental Rights in Education legislation that was recently signed into law by the state’s Republican governor Ron DeSantis.
In early March, the Human Rights Campaign said that it would refuse to accept donations from the Walt Disney Company until it took “meaningful action” against the then Parental Rights in Education Bill.
President Donald Trump was accused of admitting to a "quid pro quo" on Monday after a viral tweet grossly misrepresented remarks that Trump made during a campaign stop.
As it turned out, Trump made no such admission.
During a campaign rally in Prescott, Arizona, on Monday, Trump illustrated a quid pro quo while explaining why he doesn't make fundraising calls to CEOs of major companies.
But if you saw a tweet by Vox journalist Aaron Rupar — which millions of Americans saw, in fact — you may think that Trump was admitting to an actual quid pro quo. That's because Rupar pulled Trump's words out of context to make it appear that Trump admitted to engaging in a quid pro quo with Exxon CEO Darren Woods.
Cementing his tweet with the hashtag "#QuidProQuo" — making very clear the allegation he was levying against Trump — Rupar quoted Trump as saying:
I call the head of Exxon. I'll use a company. "How, how are you doing, how's energy coming? When are doing the exploration? Oh, you need a couple of permits, huh?" But I call the head of Exxon, I say, "You know, I'd love you to send me $25m for the campaign."
The complete misrepresentation of Trump's words ignited a firestorm on social media, resulting in the president's detractors to literally accusing him of a felony.
"The conduct described by @realDonaldTrump is a felony and punishable with prison time," Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Hawaii) said.
The conduct described by @realDonaldTrump is a felony and punishable with prison time.#QuidProQuo https://t.co/Qz2KG31JPH— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu)1603144502.0
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) joined in the pillaging. "So @exxonmobil & friends, care to tell us the end of this story? Did you coordinate the $25 million?" she said.
So @exxonmobil & friends, care to tell us the end of this story?Did you coordinate the $25 million? https://t.co/0YI5VhWYzS— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)1603144618.0
As even Washington Post fact-checker Daniel Dale explained, Trump was not, in fact, admitting to a crime.
"Again, the clip that's circulating has a misleading caption; Trump's point was that it compromises a president to make personal fundraising calls to big CEOs, so he won't," Dale explained. "Once more: A) Trump *does* do lots of high-dollar fundraising, but B) He was clearly not admitting here to corruption or an actual deal with Exxon. Carry on."
Once more: A) Trump *does* do lots of high-dollar fundraising, but B) He was clearly not admitting here to corrupti… https://t.co/cjttdByJnq— Daniel Dale (@Daniel Dale)1603142494.0
Even Exxon was forced to respond.
"We are aware of the President's statement regarding a hypothetical call with our CEO…and just so we're all clear, it never happened," the company said.
Rupar eventually deleted his misleading tweet. He claimed that he thought his tweet clearly represented that Trump was discussing a hypothetical, but said he deleted the tweet because "folks are interpreting in a more literal way."
But again, Rupar's tweet contained zero context and literally used the hashtag #QuidProQuo."
Deleted this because the quote reads too much like something Trump actually said to Exxon when he was talking about… https://t.co/a2Sn1V0ggb— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar)1603161165.0
Too Soon to Write Off the Titanic? | 4/25/22