Satan loves chaos: Celebrities sob over mass deportations



The propaganda surrounding Trump’s new immigration policies is ramping up, and celebrity Selena Gomez is leading the charge.

“I just want to say that I’m so sorry,” Gomez said through tears in a since-deleted selfie video she posted to her social media accounts. “All my people are getting attacked. The children, they don’t understand. I’m so sorry, I wish I could do something, but I can’t.”

“I don’t know what to do,” she sobbed, adding, “I’ll try everything, I promise.”

Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” thinks Gomez seems confused more than anything else.

“I don’t know what she thinks is happening, like Mexicans in general are not just getting deported,” Stuckey says. “Actually, we’re protecting children of this country by protecting our borders, by disincentivizing the sex trafficking that occurs because of the liberal immigration law that has prevailed over the past not only four years but by and large over the past several decades.”


And Gomez won’t be the last to leverage what Stuckey has branded “toxic empathy” against well-meaning conservatives by crying on Instagram.

“You’re going to see a lot from Christianity Today, you’re going to see a lot from the typical so-called progressive Christians that this is not the way of Jesus, that this is not Christian,” Stuckey continues. “You are going to be manipulated, you are going to be gaslit, and you are going to be told that you’re not a good Christian if you support deportation, if you support borders, and you support the enforcement of immigration law.”

While celebrities and progressive Christians will undoubtedly continue to gaslight Americans into fighting for immigration, the safety of children — and ultimately, all of us — isn’t the only reason to stand our ground.

“The biblical case for enforcing borders,” Stuckey begins, “Walls are depicted either literally or symbolically throughout scripture. They are seen as symbols or as the protection of order, and God is a god of order. He placed us in a garden, not a jungle.”

“He is a god of parameters, he is a god of definitions, borders, countries, were all his idea for our good. The Tower of Babel and the confusion that ensued after that because people couldn’t speak the same language — that was a curse, not a blessing,” she continues.

“God has given us families and communities and countries so that we could build societies in which people in particular, the most vulnerable people, could thrive. Anarchy and lawlessness and chaos, those are all seen as descriptions of what Satan loves throughout scripture,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump’s new mRNA vaccine: What’s really happening?



President Donald Trump has already made a lot of sweeping changes following his long-awaited inauguration — but he’s made one move that has his voters questioning his motives.

At a press conference this week, Trump announced the formation of Project Stargate alongside Oracle’s chief technology officer, Larry Ellison; OpenAI CEO Sam Altman; and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son.

The project is an at least $500 billion investment to build the infrastructure to power AI construction, and one of its nice-sounding aims is to improve health outcomes — but what does that really mean?

“Once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer, and you can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically again in about 48 hours,” Ellison explained at the White House on January 21.


“So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in 48 hours. That is the promise of AI and the promise of the future,” he added.

Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” and her father, Ron Simmons, aren’t too pleased with Ellison’s delivery.

“Using the word vaccine and mRNA in this day and time is a little sensitive,” Simmons says. “I think he’s using the wrong term, ‘vaccine.’”

“The mRNA vaccines, we all know that there has been a lot of problems with that, and I would not want them rushing out to try to figure out a 48-hour vaccine. Scares me to death. The last one they did in six or seven months really had a negative effect on a lot of people,” he continues.

“In fact, I think probably was behind some pretty bad turnouts for people, and so I think that was wrong,” he adds. “But that’s not all of what this program is about. Health care is one of the things, there’ll be other things as well that’ll be used for the Defense Department.”

“So I’m really excited about seeing what happens out of it,” he adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The real reason Donald Trump didn’t put his hand on the Bible during his inauguration



Many keen observers noticed that when Donald Trump was taking the oath of office on Inauguration Day, he didn’t place his hand on either of the two Bibles held by his wife, Melania Trump. One of those Bibles was Trump’s personal Bible, given to him by his mother; the other was the Lincoln Bible that was used when Abraham Lincoln took the presidential oath in 1861.

As Chief Justice John Roberts led President Trump through the swearing-in recitation, he held his right hand up instead of placing it on the Bibles.

Some were very upset by this. After all, in 2017 during his first inauguration, President Trump did place his hand on the Bibles held by his wife. Further, Vice President JD Vance, who was sworn in just before Trump, placed his hand on the Bible held by his wife, Usha Vance.

What gives? Should we read into this?

Allie Beth Stuckey dives into the controversy.

“People were saying, ‘Oh, this must mean something; this is bad,’ but in reality, it is not required for you to put your hand on the Bible,” says Allie, adding, “I don't think he's signifying anything.”

“Actually, if you watch the video of this happening, it was a little rushed. You could tell Melania was trying to get up by him and Chief Justice Roberts started reading the oath before Melania was right there, and so I think it was just a rushed situation,” she speculates.

Of course, there’s always the possibility that Trump intentionally didn’t place his hand on the Bibles, but given how many times he explicitly mentioned God in his speech — “I was saved by God to make America great again,” “we will not forget our God,” and “one family and one glorious nation under God” — it’s unlikely that his hand placement had some symbolic meaning.

Further, “The fact that they provided their own family Bible means that they did care about that, that it was important to them, even if it was just symbolic,” adds Allie. “If they didn't care at all, they wouldn't have provided a family Bible.”

To hear more of her analysis on the inauguration, watch the episode above.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Egyptian pastor reveals shocking Islam-LGBT plot to conquer the West



Christians are fleeing the churches of America and the West en masse after leftist ideology has infiltrated and weakened them — and Pastor Andrew Sedra, founder and lead pastor of Echo Church in Australia, knows why that has happened.

“It’s the whole feminization of the church, where we value love without truth, empathy without courage, the love of God without the fear of God, being nice over being truthful, and being loving and not fighting,” Sedra tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.”

And as the churches of the West are falling, an unlikely — and unholy — alliance has formed to conquer the ashes.

“Islam hates America because Islam hates Christianity, and Islam hates Christianity because Islam hates freedom. See, the left is the same. The left hates America because they hate Christianity. They hate Christianity because they hate freedom,” Sedra explains, adding, “it’s an antichrist movement.”


“So what you’ll figure out is that progressivism and Islam are the exact same thing. I know they’re the total opposite, but they’re the total same. You have the unholy alliance between godless leftism and violent Islam. They’re both violent, they’re both authoritarian, they’re both totalitarian, they both go after the church,” he continues.

In Australia, Sedra explains that he “watched the left act exactly like the Muslims.”

“Hate speech laws are blasphemy laws. Same thing. We have in Australia anti-conversion-therapy laws, where as a pastor, I will go to jail if I pray for a gay person. Three to five years,” he says.

“So what I figured out as I came here is that the progressive left and violent Islam, they are the exact same guy. The green and the red, the communist red and the green Islam. It’s the same demonic spirit of the antichrist,” he continues, noting that when it comes to the large LGBTQ sect of the left, it’s a “sex cult.”

“It’s a sex cult. God created us to love people, worship Him, and use sex," Sedra says. He again notes that while conversion therapy only focuses on prayer and speaking to people who believe they’re gay, it will land anyone who tries it in Australia in jail.

But the real conversion is being perpetrated by the radical leftists themselves.

“They are the ones transing the kids and converting them from a man to a woman, but they’re projecting it onto you,” he says. “I’m not doing any conversion. I’m telling the kid, ‘Hey, you’re not gay. Nature tells you you can have babies when you get married. Male and female, you don’t need to cut your body parts off, you just need to get your soul right with God.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Conservatives: Stop making excuses for Andrew Tate



The influence of Andrew Tate has spread rapidly through conservative youth, particularly among young disillusioned men. While some conservatives believe it’s a good thing, Allie Beth Stuckey believes it’s dangerous.

“You will see conservatives, unabashedly, without caveat, uncritically platform Andrew Tate and say, ‘Well, he’s got interesting things to say about society, so I’m just going to forget the rest of everything that he is and I’m going to platform him without pushing back at all,’” Stuckey says.

While Stuckey doesn’t believe someone has to be perfect in order to be heard, she explains that Tate’s message is a “net negative.”

Tate, who recently converted to Islam, is a British-American social media influencer with 10.5 million followers on X and 2 million on Rumble, and he once ran a cam girl business where he hired women to essentially do “virtual porn sessions” with male customers.


“They would take the women, would take a tiny cut of the money, and then Tate and his brother, I believe, would take most of the money. And so, he also sold courses on how men can become pimps and how men can get women to do whatever they want them to do,” Stuckey explains.

Tate is extraordinarily popular in the United Kingdom, where a 2023 survey found that eight in 10 British boys ages 16-17 had consumed Tate’s content. He also currently faces charges in Romania for “human trafficking for trafficking of minors, for forming an organized criminal group, sexual intercourse with a minor, and money laundering.”

Tate denies these allegations, claiming that it’s simply the matrix out to get him because he’s disrupting the feminist system.

However, his own words make that hard to believe.

“I have to f*** her so she obeys me. I don’t give a **** about having sex with beautiful women. I f*** them so they listen to me, so I can get what I actually want, which is not them; it’s a means to an end. Every single Bond girl was exploited; that’s exactly what I do,” Tate said in a video he took of himself.

“When I watch a Bond film and I see him basically pimp a *****, to me that speaks to my heart. I’ve been there, I’ve done that. Anyone who’s followed me long enough knows that I first made my million dollars with a webcam business. I have met beautiful women with a good personality and thought, ‘She will make me money,’” Tate continued.

Tate, who has claimed that this all happened 10 years ago, has also allegedly forced women who worked for him to get his name tattooed on them, like a brand.

“That wasn’t all 10 years ago,” Stuckey says. “Some of what he was saying was just a few years ago. He openly admitted during COVID that he hired more girls to pimp out for this so-called sex work, this prostitution over cameras.”

Now, Tate is teasing a potential run for prime minister.

“Why do people listen to Andrew Tate? Is it something that we should consider, is it because there is a dearth of masculinity on the right? Is it because Christians have become so feminized and have not given good masculine examples to men?” Stuckey asks.

“I don’t think that it is not worth debating,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Boys are suddenly failing out of kindergarten. Here's why.



Boys and girls are different. That’s a statement you’ll never see debated here.

But just how different are they? According to physician, psychologist, and best-selling author Dr. Leonard Sax, they are so different that they respond vastly differently to nearly everything — discipline methods, parenting styles, and even academic environments.

Dr. Sax tells Allie Beth Stuckey that the cognitive differences between boys and girls can actually be seen using brain imaging in the womb.

These prenatal scans reinforce something that has long been known about boys and girls: “Boys mature much more slowly than girls.”

In fact, the average 18-month-old boy has a vocabulary of 40 words, while his female equivalent has a vocabulary of 90 words.

It’s no surprise, then, that boys tend to struggle in our modern school system more than girls — especially in the lower grades.

But this wasn’t always the case, says Dr. Sax. Back in the 1980s, kindergarten could be described as “duck-duck-goose and singing and rounds and arts and crafts and field trips to go to the park and splash in a pond and chase after tadpoles.”

But that changed in the 1990s, when there was a sudden push to get kindergarteners to “read and write and do arithmetic.” Suddenly kindergarten became more like first grade.

This has posed enormous challenges for young boys, says Dr. Sax, because “the language areas of the brain of the 5-year-old boy” are equivalent to that of a “3-year-old girl.”

Thus “it is not developmentally appropriate to expect a 5-year-old boy to sit and learn about phonics and diphthongs for 45 minutes,” he explains. “The result is many 5-year-old boys fail and decide that they're dumb and … that they hate school.”

This attitude of defeat stays with them as they advance to higher grade levels, tainting their overall academic experience.

“Researchers have found that once those attitudes are formed, they are global, stable, and non-contingent.”

Global, Dr. Sax explains, means “he doesn't just think he's dumb in reading and writing, he believes he's dumb in every subject.” Stable means that if you “track him down in 10th grade, he still believes that he's dumb and that the teacher hates him.” Non-contingent means that “he doesn’t think that there’s anything he can do about it or anything that you can do about it.”

Over 20 years ago, Dr. Sax wrote a paper advising parents not to enroll their 5-year-old boys in kindergarten and instead wait until they are 6 years of age.

“I still think that’s a good idea [today],” he says.

To hear more of Dr. Sax’s parenting advice, including his stance on social media, discipline, and navigating culture, watch the episode above.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Social media isn’t the problem, American culture is. Doctor explains what’s really wrong with today’s youth.



Mental health issues have been on the rise among American youth since the mid 2000s. Ask anyone why that is, and they’ll probably tell you social media is the culprit.

And they’re not totally wrong. The use of social media has risen in tandem with adolescent depression and anxiety.

However, according to physician, psychologist, and best-selling author Dr. Leonard Sax, this trend “is confined to kids in the English-speaking world in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia.”

“Kids in Greece, kids in Russia are just as likely to have smartphones and just as likely to be on social media, but the rise in anxiety and depression has not been seen there,” he tells Allie Beth Stuckey.

Why the discrepancy?

The answer, Dr. Sax says, lies in our toxic culture.

“It's important for parents to understand that the smartphones, the social media are vectors. They are spreading this toxic culture, but they are not themselves the cause,” he explains. “What is toxic about American culture, about English-speaking culture — that is driving this rise in anxiety and depression.”

What’s so toxic about English-speaking culture?

Well, the list is long, but Dr. Sax says studies have pinpointed the crux of the problem. Interestingly, the answer can be found in the evolution of children’s television shows.

Dr. Sax points to a study conducted by UCLA, as part of which researchers “looked at the most popular TV shows marketed to children and teens every 10 years starting in 1967 and analyzed these TV shows based on what the show is teaching kids about what's important.”

According to the study, in 1967, the most popular family television show was “The Andy Griffith Show”; in 1977 it was “Happy Days; in 1987 it was “Family Ties”; and in 1997 it was “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.”

“The researchers found that each of those shows (1967 through 1997) was communicating the same message: that the most important thing is to do the right thing — to tell the truth even if it hurts, to be a good friend even when that's not easy,” says Dr. Sax.

By 2007, however, that message had been tossed out and replaced with something vastly different. Instead of doing what’s right, the message that was communicated via popular shows like “American Idol” and "Survivor" was that winning and being famous were the most important things.

“Doing the right thing — that’s gonna get you voted off the island,” says Dr. Sax, explaining the cultural shift.

What caused American culture to shift is the next obvious question.

Dr. Sax says that’s a three-part answer.

1. Social Media

“Social media transformed American culture. Suddenly it became all about having likes and followers,” says Dr. Sax, adding that this spawned “a culture of envy” that fosters discontentedness and resentment, hence the rise in mental health issues among adolescents.

Like any generation, today’s youth hunger for greatness. But social media has taught them that the answer lies in fame and recognition. This mentality stands in direct opposition to what greatness once meant to the average person.

50 years ago, greatness was defined by a different set of standards. It wasn’t about popularity or winning; it was about values. The culture of the past is captured in Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous quote: “Anybody can be great because anybody can serve,” says Dr. Sax.

Today, only a tiny percentage of social media users become influencers, leaving the vast majority feeling perpetually disappointed and inadequate.

2. Culture of disrespect

Our modern culture, Dr. Sax explains, has normalized children disrespecting and defying their parents.

“These shows on the Disney Channel teach kids that it's cute and funny to be defiant, to be disrespectful,” he says.

Popular music does it too. Songs like Lil Nas X’s “Old Town Road” captures this widespread air of defiance.

“Can’t nobody tell me nothing,” the song says eight times.

“That’s the culture of disrespect in a nutshell,” says Dr. Sax, noting that this attitude among our youth “breaks the bonds across generations,” making kids less likely to attend church and less interested in spending time with older people who have wisdom to offer.

3. 'Normophobia'

“15 years ago, American girls wanted to be effortlessly perfect,” says Dr. Sax. Today’s girls and young women, however, perceive perfection as boring.

“Now, you’ve got to have something wrong with you,” he says, noting that having depression, anxiety, and even being transgender are popular labels.

“'Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed,'” says Dr. Sax, quoting C.S. Lewis’ “The Magician’s Nephew.”

Girls today are “substituting anxious or depressed for ‘stupider,’” he explains, noting that Lewis’ children’s proverb has proven itself true. It turns out that believing you are anxious or depressed makes you legitimately anxious or depressed.

The fear of being normal coupled with the coining and circulation of new language, such as gender-conforming vs. gender-nonconforming and neurotypical vs. neurodivergent, has encouraged kids to attach their identities to negative language. Belief then turns this negative language into actual conditions.

To hear more of Dr. Sax’s research on this subject, watch the episode above.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

You won’t believe the timeline of events that led to California’s fiery inferno



As the wildfires in California rage on and leave thousands of Americans homeless, people are beginning to wonder what might be to blame for the relentless flames.

Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” has some answers — though some might not want to hear them.

“I’m not trying to chastise people who politically disagree with me, but just to say that again, our political decisions, our worldviews, actually have consequences, and it’s really important that we look with specificity at the choices that have been made over the years that have led California to where it is now,” Stuckey says.

“Over the last 50 years, environmental-focused laws, both federal and state, have deeply impacted how that water, which California relies on for everything, is prioritized,” she continues. “One example of water policy that is currently being discussed by many, including President-elect Trump, involves this tiny fish called the delta smelt.”


The delta smelt is a small endangered fish in Northern California’s Delta region, and policies that are aimed at preserving the smelt’s habitat have led to water regulations that send excess water to the habitat rather than to storage for the state’s large population and agricultural uses.

Natural resource economist Dr. Scott Hamilton estimates that the amount of water supply that is restricted in order to protect the delta smelt exceeds 10 million acre feet — which is enough water to supply Los Angeles for about 15 to 20 years. The cost to replace that water is around $5 billion.

This all began in 1970, when President Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to fully determine the environmental effects of any actions they take, which are known as environmental impact statements.

Even President Ronald Reagan signed many policies into law that have laid the foundation for what Stuckey calls “bad things today” when it comes to immigration and environmental law.

“This law that Ronald Reagan signed is central to California’s regulatory landscape. The law’s purpose is to ensure projects with significant environmental impacts are mitigated or stopped. And that all sounds good until you realize that these regulatory agencies have so much power and are really able to make these kinds of arbitrary decisions that can greatly harm individuals, their businesses, their ability to farm,” Stuckey explains.

Because of all of these regulatory policies, no significant water storage products have been built in California in over 45 years, despite the state’s population increasing roughly 67% from 1980 to 2020.

“Then, if you look at the early 1990s, this period marks a critical shift in California water policy, with growing federal intervention and a stronger focus on environmental protections for endangered species,” Stuckey says, before focusing the conversation back on the delta smelt.

“So, apparently, they found two delta smelt in 2017 after all of these efforts, after all of the harm that they’ve done, they only found two of these fish. So there is actually no proof whatsoever that these regulations, that these programs, that all of these efforts, this blocking of water access, has actually helped the survival of the delta smelt at all,” Stuckey says.

“So that is at least partly, in large part, what has happened to the water supply in California. It is largely environmental. But, as we articulated, there are other factors playing into this, but none of that was inevitable, none of that was accidental. All of it was the result of a deliberate policy decision,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'People were upset I wore pants': Jinger Duggar Vuolo on rejecting unbiblical rules



Jinger Duggar Vuolo grew up in a strict household under legalism, before allowing biblical truth, the true gospel, to help her break free.

Jinger was schooled in the teachings of Bill Gothard, who was a man that claimed his teachings were the word of God that everyone should abide by.

“His side was more man-made rules,” she tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.” “If you looked at the lives of his followers, sadly, they were living a lie. Half of them were not able to stop the indulgence of their flesh, because it was outward things they were doing.”

“Some of them may have been believers, some of them weren’t, but they were trying to find a key outside of scripture, outside of themselves, that was not from the Lord,” she continues, noting that Gothard himself was accused by multiple women of sexual misconduct.


“It was all outward. So the external side of that, that focus on the externals like the Pharisees, really, I think that’s what was driving his teachings. So you prop people up until you can’t anymore, and then when real life hits, when temptation comes, they fall, because they were not truly the Lord's, or they were not truly grounded in the word,” she explains.

Jinger herself was praised for what she was able to accomplish externally, like dressing modestly.

“I was trying to keep up all the outward things until I couldn’t anymore, until I was so broken, and I wasn’t saved until the age of 14,” she says. “So that was something I noticed, this pattern of just trying to keep everyone happy around me, and it wasn’t until I realized I can’t do that whenever I have differences and disagreements.”

“Whenever I stopped walking in those teachings of Bill Gothard, it immediately shifted, and I had people mad at me for living by conviction. When I started wearing pants, it was hard. There were people who were very upset about that and they felt like I was walking away from the faith for marrying someone who was in a different theological camp than me,” she continues.

“But we’re not talking about immodest,” Stuckey comments, adding, “Because that is what it is. You realize that, OK, that is not necessarily the biblical standard of modesty. Yes, we’re supposed to be modest, but it is not a biblical dictate that women have to be wearing dresses or skirts.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Elon: 'F*** you in the face' if you oppose H-1B visas



Elon Musk may be Donald Trump’s new right-hand man, but Americans across the country are beginning to question his allegiance to the red, white, and blue — after the latest H-1B controversy that’s taken over right-wing political debate.

The debate began when Trump appointed India-born Sriram Krishnan to be his administration’s policy advisor for AI, and supporters pointed out that Krishnan has supported increasing the immigration of skilled workers.

Trump supporters argued that this directly contradicts Trump’s America First policy.

Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk chimed in, siding with Krishnan’s immigration stance — before Americans found out that Elon would hire an immigrant over an American if they were more skilled.

The pair also claimed in a series of posts on X that Americans have been conditioned through their culture to be lazier than immigrants from places like India.

Musk even responded to a critic on X: "The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla, and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B. Take a big step back and F*CK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend."


Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” and her father, Ron Simmons, aren’t so sure Musk is doing the right thing.

“Like everything, nothing is simple. It’s a complex subject, and if we want America first, then we need to have the brightest in certain areas,” Simmons tells Stuckey.

“Now, would we prefer them to be American citizens? Absolutely, 100%. There is truth about our education system, as you know, our education system fails our kids day in and day out. The public education system does and that’s where the core of this issue begins,” Simmons explains.

Incoming President Donald Trump has been playing with the idea of “abolishing the Department of Education,” which Simmons believes could be a good start.

“It should go right back down to where the parents have the most control. That’s how you get schools to be better. But in the meantime, if we do want these technologies that we need to control and be the leader in, we do need to have the brightest people,” he says.

“I will say that we should look for American citizens first,” Simmons continues. “It doesn’t need to be a level playing field, in my opinion. In that, we should try to hire as many citizens as we can and we’ve got a lot of them that maybe are being passed over because of the wage thing.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.