What’s worse than the likely deaths of millions of adults from the COVID shots? The increasing probability that the gene juice was passed on to the next generation of babies, including those who were never directly injected with the mRNA. That would mean the shocking body count of spike protein victims may continue for an entirely new generation long after the pandemic is over.

Consider the fact that the U.S. government is approving, recommending, and funding the dangerous vaccines for everyone — including pregnant and lactating women — even though we now know that officials knew from day one that the vaccine spreads everywhere in the body, including to the mammary glands of lactating women. Now, a brand-new study published in the Lancet, which is the Bible of the medical industry, concedes that the vaccine molecules percolate everywhere in the body and are present in the breast milk.

“Of 13 lactating women receiving the vaccine (20 exposures), trace mRNA amounts were detected in 10 exposures up to 45 [hours] post-vaccination,” observed the researchers from NYU Langone Hospital’s pediatrics department after examining breast milk samples from these women prior to and following vaccination.

The authors confirmed what those of us paying attention knew over two years ago, but many were gaslit into believing the opposite. “The COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically,” they conceded as the logical conclusion of their broader experiment.

This study comes roughly a year after a research letter published in JAMA found traces of the mRNA shot in the breast milk of seven of 11 vaccinated nursing women researched.

So we now have two top medical journals confirming the presence of the vaccine in breast milk. Asserting this premise got me fact-checked and canceled from social media throughout 2021, even when I cited previous studies indicating exposure to the shot via lactation.

Of course, now that the authors of this study can no longer hide this disquieting fact, they adroitly get out ahead of the obvious implication by immediately asserting in the opening line, without evidence: “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines play a vital role in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Additionally, after being forced to accept the obvious, they seek to downplay the effects on breast milk by noting that the traces of gene therapy found in the extracellular vesicles “neither expressed SARS-COV-2 spike protein nor induced its expression in the HT-29 cell line.” In other words, it’s innocuous and can’t affect the baby.

Problem solved? Not exactly.

As astute researcher Igor Chudov rightly observes, for some bizarre reason the samples from their control group never expressed spike protein to begin with! “However, positive control samples used in concentrations similar to those of BM EVs also failed to induce S protein expression,” acknowledge the authors as a confounding point to their implication about breast milk traces being biologically inactive.

So clearly the authors were using a cell line that was not expressing spike protein in any context, thereby rendering their secondary conclusion (traces found are inert) irrelevant. However, the primary conclusion of finding the mRNA in the breast milk is solid. The authors vividly explain how the breast milk is exposed to the vaccine: “The LNPs will release their mRNA content into the cytosol of the mammary gland cells, and a portion of this mRNA will be recruited, packaged, and released in the BM EVs (exosomes or microvesicles). This can be significant as the BM EVs act as natural LNPs, protecting the mRNA from degradation.”

This study cannot be examined in a vacuum, as if we have no other corroborating evidence of dangers to the baby from a vaccinated mother in lactation. Thanks to court documents, we now have an eight-page confidential document from Pfizer itself dated April 20, 2021 – before most pregnant women would have gotten the shot – acknowledging that the vaccine spreads transplacentally and via lactation. Furthermore, Pfizer was aware of and tracking adverse events in babies exposed to the mother’s vaccination. Clearly, the company suspected the mRNA was indeed biologically active.

While OB/GYNs all over the world were officiously and obnoxiously lecturing their patients to get the experimental shots, Pfizer was observing AEs in a whopping 20% of the 215 lactating women in its sample. The report chronicles 10 serious AEs, including facial paralysis, lymphadenopathy (swelling of lymph nodes that could be associated with cancer), and blurred vision, and six among the infants, including skin exfoliation, rashes, swollen skin, and unspecified sickness. That’s a high percentage of serious AEs for babies for any thereputic.

Let’s not forget that to this day, we still do not have a formal Pfizer study of the shot’s safety in lactating women, even as the CDC recommends more shots for all ages, despite the wealth of injuries across the board. The European database EudraVigilance is now reporting 46,999 fatalities and 4,731,833 injuries following injections of five mRNA COVID vaccines. Typically, we don’t allow pregnant and lactating women to take any experimental medication – even with no apparent signs of adverse events. In this case, we are well into the third year of observing widespread death and injury affecting every corner of the body – now buttressed by a litany of studies showing the lipid nano particles cross every blood barrier and can circulate in the body for at least six months. Yet the policies and recommendations fail to reflect any of this knowledge because the findings of these studies are suppressed.

In order for this lactation study to be published in the Lancet, the authors were forced to infer that the smoke they confirmed is absolutely no indication of a fire. Except we’ve already seen such adverse events in nursing mothers, including cases where it’s hard to dismiss the vaccine as the culprit. Here is one vivid VAERS entry:

There’s your fire to accompany the smoke of traces of mRNA present in the milk.

In addition to VAERs and Pfizer’s original documents, the European Union is publishing post-marketing pharmacovigilance of Pfizer’s own observations on serious adverse events, including in nursing babies. Investigative reporter Sonia Elijah has combed through the EU’s Periodic Safety Update reports and has discovered that Pfizer documented numerous cases of strokes, convulsions, and respiratory failure among nursing babies. Ironically, appallingly, and counterintuitively, Pfizer refused to investigate further because these AEs were automatically dismissed as unrelated to the vaccine. Why? Because Pfizer simply removed them from the analysis! In the words of the Pfizer investigator, these serious AEs were “determined to be non-contributory and were not included in the discussion since these cases involved exposures to the vaccine during the mother’s pregnancy or through breastfeeding.”

Nobody should be surprised that the presence of the vaccine, which itself caused tens of millions of adverse events in adults, would affect nursing babies. A study published a year ago in JAMA revealed that 3.5% of women reported a decrease in breast milk supply and 1.2% reported “issues with their breastmilk-fed infant after vaccination.” We see traces of mRNA, and we’ve seen a slew of undeniable anomalous injuries in nursing babies.

Does that incontrovertibly prove it as scientific law without further investigation? No. But is it tantamount to a Nuremberg Code violation to keep recommending the shots without first attempting to disprove the causation? No doubt.

Aside from the appalling revelation about breastfeeding exposure and how early on Pfizer knew about it, we are seeing a disturbing pattern of academic obfuscation emerge once again during this debate. Every time we find an ominous study, the high priests of the vaccine religion obdurately dismiss our concerns as “incomplete” findings or “speculative.” But we do have an entire array of concerning findings that cover the gambit of scientific research that, taken together, would be enough to convict the vaccines of murder if they were a human criminal defendant.

We are well beyond a simple rallying cry of “no mandates.” We need an immediate suspension of new vaccines, a commission to study the existing ones, and a new Nuremberg trial to convict those who knowingly pushed the shots, despite knowledge of widespread death and injury.