What more information needs to come to light about the risks and negative efficacy of these shots before they are taken off the market?

Today, the House is voting on the Agriculture-FDA appropriations bill, which funds all of the FDA’s operations. At a time when we should be examining all the new information that has been published about existing vaccines and suspending the new ones, the FDA is still promoting the failed and dangerous COVID shots. Now the agency is acculturating the public to the acceptability of such a high threshold of injury that the rate of heart injury from the COVID shots – just one of many possible injuries – is a whopping 1 in 35, according to a new Swiss study. So is there any threshold of injury that will cause a vaccine to be pulled from the market?

The paper from the University of Basel, published in July in the European Journal of Heart Failure, followed 777 hospital workers who got Moderna boosters to see how many presented with elevated markers of myocardial injury. They found 22 had elevated levels on day 3 after the shot without evidence of an alternative cause. That is a rate of 1 in 35. Also, 40 participants, or 1 in 19, had elevated troponin levels, which could be a sign of subclinical myocarditis. This is aside from the 8% experiencing chest pain and 9% suffering palpitations.

What is further disturbing about the study findings is that 50% of those with markers for heart inflammation were not back to normal at the follow-up checkup. This was largely a young population, with the median age being 37. Also, out of the 24 people with confirmed prior COVID, two of them presented with higher troponin levels. Although that is a small sample size, it raises further concerns that all these seniors being pressured to get more COVID shots before the fall (along with flu and now RSV shots) will face an even greater risk of heart injury if they already had COVID.

While none of them suffered cardiac arrests, such a high rate of elevated heart markers for risk of long-term damage should be unacceptable even for a shot that actually works. This is a shot with negative efficacy for a pandemic that is long over. How can our government continue distributing and funding it?

Interestingly enough, this study found a much greater risk for heart inflammation among females. A Thai study published last year found 3.5% of teenage boys in the sample developed clinical or subclinical myocarditis/pericarditis. But this study shows women can also be at risk. This is particularly problematic as the medical profession and CDC continue to pressure pregnant women, including the overwhelming majority of those who already got the virus, to get a booster shot.

In a twisted irony, the only shot that is available is the bivalent booster for strains that are long extinct! The FDA has greenlit the manufacturer to make new boosters liability-free for the fall XBB. 1.5 variant, when, ironically, even this new variant is down to just 12% of cases and will likely be extinct in a month.

How is it that despite mountains of evidence showing these shots reaching criminals levels of dangerous risk and lack of efficacy, not a single policy surrounding the shots themselves or the approval, pharmacovigilance, and liability process has changed? How come it’s not even on the radar of congressional leaders, and RFK Jr. and Ron DeSantis are the only ones calling for a reckoning?

In addition to the Pfizer documents showing that Pfizer knew about millions of adverse events, new documents obtained from the FDA show that Moderna knew the same thing. An activist group named Defending the Republic obtained 15,000 pages of Moderna documents thanks to litigation, and they show the same pattern as the Pfizer documents: namely, suspicious deaths and injuries that were simply ignored and ruled as not caused by the shots. People who died suddenly were determined to have died from other causes despite no autopsy. Clinical trial participants who developed Bell’s palsy and shingles fewer than 10 days after getting the shot were ignored. People in the vaccinated group were observed to have experienced heart attacks, pulmonary embolisms, and spontaneous miscarriages. Yet none of this was flagged … and isn’t through this very day.

But now we know. There have been ubiquitous reproductive health issues, maternal-fetal adverse events that Pfizer was aware of in 2021. A new study published in JAMA observing 76 pregnant women who got the two mRNA shots revealed abnormal rates of birth problems, particularly for Moderna, which is a higher dose than Pfizer.

Although the sample size is small, the rates of NICU admissions, pre-eclampsia, and congenital anomalies in general are way over the baseline rates and are especially alarming because they show a dose-dependency relationship. And of course, nobody has gotten to the bottom of the mystery of what caused the unprecedented spike in neonatal deaths in Scotland right around the time the shots were administered.

To this very day, nobody in our government is interested in further studying thousands upon thousands of glaring and blaring safety signals, even as they rush out new vaccines – both for COVID and other ailments – built on the same technology, approval process, or fraudulent clinical trials and pharmacovigilance. As Public Health Scotland said last year, even embarking on a study of the relationship between vaccines and reproductive problems would be “uninformative for public health decision making” and has “the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time.”

The time has come to change the trajectory by supporting Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green and Mary Miller’s amendment to bar all funding for COVID vaccines in the FDA funding bill.

If we don’t put an end to Operation Warp Speed now, the COVID shots will just be the opening act. Officials have already approved several RSV shots with known problems and terrible data. There is now a $9 billion market our government created for unnecessary RSV shots.

The FDA also just suspiciously rushed approval for a new anthrax vaccine made by Emergent that has caused birth defects in limited trial data.

Given the liability shield, the endless subsidies both for the manufacturers and for medical groups to promote them, the child vaccination de facto mandate, and the rampant censorship, there will never be enlightened consent for those who are administered the torrent of new shots hitting the market at warp speed.

How can a GOP Congress pass a funding bill for the FDA without a reckoning of the therapeutic jihad establishment health officials continue to wage against us?