Horowitz: If this global study is right, then funding the shots is very wrong
I recently took a trip to my local Walgreens to pick up a prescription and was shocked to find a line at the pharmacy in middle of a workday. Two and a half years after the fraud and danger behind the COVID shots have been exposed, there are still endless unsuspecting seniors who are being convinced that the gene therapy is a key to their survival.
This got me thinking that those of us who believe in fighting abortion even though it is not mandated have a concomitant obligation to fight the existence of these death shots over and beyond the mandates.
And make no mistake, they are death shots.
A group of Canadian researchers collated all-cause mortality data over the past few years from most South American countries, along with South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and equatorial region countries, such as Thailand and Singapore. The countries span four continents and roughly mirror the global vaccination rate on average. Although we didn’t need this analysis to affirm what lived experience has taught us, they confirm that all 17 countries “have transitions to regimes of high ACM (all-cause mortality), which occur when the COVID-19 vaccines are deployed and administered [emphasis added].”
Most disturbingly, they found that in nine countries, there was virtually zero excess mortality for the period of the pandemic in 2020 preceding the rollout of the vaccines. As I chronicled throughout my coverage of the pandemic’s epidemiological trajectory, East Asian and Pacific Rim countries almost seemed immune to serious COVID for the first year of the pandemic. The negative efficacy (or safety signals) of the shots was most evident in this part of the world because these countries only began experiencing excess mortality after the vaccine rollout.
“Nine of the 17 countries have no detectable excess ACM in the period of approximately one year after a pandemic was declared on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), until the vaccines are rolled out (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay),” observed the authors based on data readily available for anyone to see. The study is very thorough and spans 180 pages, including 178 references and dozens of tables and appendixes showing the sources and methodology.
What is particularly jarring is that most of these countries experienced their worst death curves in the third year of the pandemic, which was the year of Omicron in 2022. This variant was rarely considered to be thrombotic and was not known to cause widespread blood clotting or the cytokine storm that killed so many in 2020-2021 from lung damage. So what could be the culprit?
The authors continue: “Unprecedented peaks in ACM occur in the summer (January-February) of 2022 in the Southern Hemisphere, and in equatorial-latitude countries, which are synchronous with or immediately preceded by rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts (3rd or 4th doses). This phenomenon is present in every case with sufficient mortality data (15 countries).”
Remember, we have reams of evidence showing that the uptake of the vaccines was associated with a wider spread of COVID.
Why did so many working aged people die in Australia in 2022 despite near-universal vaccination, when this age group was not at serious risk from omicron-type covid?\n\nPerhaps more importantly, what happened in Australia in 2019?— PLC (@PLC) 1686587247
Chile is the most covid-vaccinated nation on Earth, with all adults vaccinated and >50% boosted in 2021 and another 1 dose per person administered in 2022.\n\nIf vaccines are "safe and effective", why did so many Chileans die in 2022, after everyone was vax'd and boosted?— PLC (@PLC) 1683909422
From mid-2021 the vaccines should have started to take effect. This are the cumulative excess deaths from June 2021 to June 2023. If there were free journalism, the media of the countries with excess would be insistently asking what is the reason.\n\nSource: https://t.co/SxDQGgWqjS— JGEFAELL (@JGEFAELL) 1690903129
Thus, it’s easy to see that many people contracted COVID during that period, ultimately died of other ailments — possibly cardiac damage from the shots — but were counted as COVID deaths. This drove a self-fulfilling cycle of panic and vaccination drives, which constantly reinforced the cycle of illness and death while offering the illusion that the widespread detection of COVID in the population was the culprit for the mortality.
The study’s authors were further able to quantify the vaccine fatality rate by juxtaposing the vaccination rates and excess death rates by age bracket. They found that the vaccine was actually deadlier with advanced age.
“Our work, using extensive data for Australia and Israel, has also shown that vDFR (vaccine dose fatality rate) is exponential with age (doubling every 5 years of age), reaching approximately 1% for 80+ year olds.” The rate was 5% for 90-year-olds! The authors were able to calculate this because those two countries have the most extensive age-stratified data both for vaccination and mortality rates.
As you can see, Australia barely experienced excess mortality before the vaccine rollout. It then suffered extensive mortality following the rollout of the shots, then an even bigger wave of mortality following the boosters in late 2021, even as other countries reaped the benefits of the milder Omicron variant causing lower mortality in 2022.
In total, the authors estimate that the vaccines were responsible for 1.745 million excess deaths in these 17 countries, which have a total population of more than 800 million people who received more than 1.3 billion doses of the vaccine. Extrapolated for the global population and number of doses, this would equal 17 million vaccine deaths worldwide!
Here is the math of their extrapolated vaccine fatality estimate:
Previously, we estimated that a representative global value would be 0.1 %, and that this would represent approximately 13 million deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines, from 13.25 billion injections up to 24 January 2023 (Rancourt et al., 2023). This can be updated as follows: (0.1257 ± 0.0035) % x 13.50 billion injections (2 September 2023, OWID, 2023a) = (16.97 ± 0.47) million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, to date. This current estimate is based on: 10.3 % of worldwide COVID-19 injections, 9.10 % of worldwide population, and a vaccination rate of 1.91 injections per person (all ages), in 17 countries.
This implies that 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths would have occurred globally, up to 2 September 2023. In other words, analysis of ACM by time in the 17 countries studied shows that the global COVID-19 vaccination campaign was in effect a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) % of the world population, and did not measurably prevent any deaths.
Even if their numbers are off, just a few million deaths would still be a holocaust. And that doesn’t factor in the suspected long-term effects, such as autoimmune disorders, neurological diseases, subclinical myocarditis, and cancers.
Even Moderna’s own booster trial estimated that “1 in 50 people who took [the booster] had a ‘medically attended adverse event,’” and the manufacturer refused to disclose the nature of the complication. If Moderna and the Biden administration had their way and administered this booster to the entire world, based on their own data, that would mean 160 million people worldwide would suffer a clinical-level injury, over 6.6 million in the U.S. alone.
How is this not the top pro-life issue in public policy?
What the Canadian analysis shows is that it’s no longer prudent to age-stratify COVID vaccines just because seniors were vulnerable to the earlier strains of the virus. Aside from the lack of evidence the shots work, seniors are possibly even more vulnerable to death from the shots. This is why Florida was prudent in becoming the only state to affirmatively recommend against the shots for those under 65. But even for seniors, Florida officials warn doctors to inform patients about the issues with subclinical myocarditis and potential damage from lingering spike protein.
Let’s not forget that within the first few months of the rollout in 2021, a study conducted by the Norwegian Medicines Agency, which examined the first 100 nursing home patients to subsequently die after having receiving the Pfizer shots, found a causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and death to be "likely" in 10 of the 100 cases, "possible" in 26 cases, and "unlikely" in in 59 of the cases. It is astounding that nobody ever followed up on that work and instead continued pounding seniors with endless doses for over two years.
Despite claims from top Republicans that the vaccines saved millions, no macro epidemiological data shows any evidence of a positive correlation between vaccination rates and lower all-cause mortality. The opposite is true — to the tune of millions of lives.
The old canard of “I oppose mandates, but the vaccines save lives” is no longer acceptable. Funding these vaccines in the federal budget is at least as bad as supporting Planned Parenthood. The voices of the blood of millions of victims cries out to all of us.