What greater illustration of the fraud of the COVID jabs than first lady Jill Biden contracting the virus for the second time after a litany of booster shots?

However, this is about a lot more than just fraud. It is no longer enough for Republicans to merely oppose mandates, which was yesterday’s issue. We have two and a half years of research demonstrating that these shots are downright dangerous to every corner of the human body. Yet our government is about to approve new versions of the shots, while Biden just allocated another $1.4 billion to promote the “next generation” of these needless and dangerous shots.

With COVID back in the news because the shots have ensured that the virus will constantly mutate around the suboptimal antibodies, Republicans in the House must promise not to fund one red cent for these shots ever again. This is the first budget deadline since Republicans took back control of Congress. This is the first time they’ve been in the driver’s seat of the budget since the plandemic, and as such, they have an obligation to all of humanity to force a reckoning for all the lives lost due to the dangerous mRNA gene therapy.

We’ve been warning about negative efficacy from the shots for over two years, constantly facing “fact-checks” and punitive strikes on social media. Yet here we are today, with the CDC admitting that the suboptimal antibodies of the COVID shots make it more likely that people will contract new variants of the virus. In its recent risk assessment for the new SARS-CoV-2 variant labeled BA.2.86, the CDC concedes in plain English, “BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines” (emphasis added).

This is not just a fact that the CDC discovered this year. Officials were well aware of this before any mandate ever got off the ground. New FOIAed emails secured by ICAN found DOD contractor Humetrix already informed the top CDC and FDA officials that data in July 2021 showed waning efficacy, not just for getting the virus but even against hospitalization.

Humetrix was hired by the Pentagon to monitor Medicare claims data, something the CDC itself should have been doing. The company discovered that 63% of all hospitalizations among seniors in July – before the mandates – were from the vaccinated. Obviously, this only got worse as time elapsed and more viral-immune escape variants were created, very likely from the vaccine itself. The data showed that infection rates at 3-4 months post-vaccination doubled at 5-6 months post-vaccination, which was the ultimate harbinger for what we all saw from real-world experience and independent studies pointing to eventual negative efficacy at least two years ago.

One email sent by Peter Marks, the director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, to other top FDA officials conceded that “the totality of the evidence” produced by Humetrix was “remarkably consistent.”

Remember, Marks was accused by FDA whistleblowers of pressuring them to violate protocols and truncate the timeline to approve the original Pfizer shot in August 2021, just one month prior to this email.

How can Republicans continue ignoring the actual shots while focusing just on the legal policies around mandating them?

But it’s a lot worse than just negative efficacy against COVID. After all, COVID at this point is just a cold for everyone. However, new evidence shows that the shots degrade our immune systems and make us more susceptible to other pathogens as well. According to a recent Australian study appearing in Frontiers in Immunology, blood samples of children who received the Pfizer shot seemed to develop lower levels of cytokines used by the innate immune system to combat infection.

The 29 blood samples of children ages 5-11 (median age 6.4) were taken before and after vaccination with the Pfizer shot in 2022. Researchers then “challenged” the blood samples with 13 different pathogens, including three COVID-19-related attacks and 10 other viruses and bacteria, including influenza virus, staphylococcus bacteria, and hepatitis B. The result? The levels of nearly all 27 cytokines tested fell, particularly around a month after vaccination. An additional eight samples were taken six months after vaccination and found a decrease in cytokine stimulation against viruses but not bacteria. As Igor Chudov points out, the charts in the study show that cytokine immune response was reduced tenfold for some pathogens.

Obviously, this is not a clinical study, but diffusers of vaccine propaganda, including the FDA, have no problem approving shots based on positive stimulation in blood cells, so negative stimulation should at least be grounds for concern. Also, this study shows the circumstantial evidence and possible pathophysiology of what is being observed in the real world and from pharmacovigilance data: namely, an increase in respiratory viruses following vaccination. Pfizer and Moderna’s own toddler trials showed an increase at the clinical level in RSV, flu, and general respiratory viruses after vaccination with the COVID shot. That lends a lot of credence to the theory that this finding in the blood samples is proof of some sort of damage to the innate immune system of those who got a number of jabs. So many people who got endless boosters seem to contract a commensurate number of COVID infections.

So how can we all be satisfied with merely fighting mandates but keeping shots on the market that could degrade our immune systems? Think about the fact that we have witnessed out-of-season RSV outbreaks since the advent of the COVID shot. This gives officials the perfect pretext to panic over the newly juiced-up pathogens created by the shots themselves so that they can promote more leaky, suboptimal shots. And indeed, that is what they just did with the approval of the RSV shots.

This is before we indulge all the latest news on vaccine injury, including a new study showing the spike protein can circulate in the body for at least six months.

Indeed, this is no longer a mandate issue, but a pro-life issue. Republicans wouldn’t fund billions in more funding or research and development for abortion. COVID gene juice should be no different.