Democrats' gerrymandering campaign in Virginia hits a snag: Obama



Democrats have spoken out of both sides of their mouths on the matter of redistricting.

Proposed changes to congressional maps that would boost Democrats' chances in elections are, on the one hand, purportedly a means to "help level the playing field," a way to "restore fairness," and — in the words of Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger — a "response to what we're seeing in other states that have taken extreme measures to undermine democratic norms."

'Gerrymandering is when politicians manipulate the maps in order to predetermine the outcome.'

When faced with proposed changes to congressional maps that threaten their power, Democrats have alternatively likened redistricting efforts to the Holocaust, called them "a threat to democracy," and characterized them as "authoritarian."

This hypocrisy has proven to be an issue for proponents of Virginia's proposed constitutional amendment, which is on the ballot in the April 21 special election.

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee — a supporter of voting "yes" in the gerrymandering referendum that would all but ensure that 10 out of the state's 11 congressional seats go to Democrats — complained on Thursday about opponents of the proposed amendment turning to former President Barack Obama for support.

"A MAGA-aligned dark money group is trying to fool Virginia voters with a dishonest mailer that features an unauthorized photo of President Barack Obama and lies about his position on the Virginia referendum," the NDRC said.

"The 'No' campaign and its allied MAGA-funded dark money groups are so terrified of the voters that they are resorting to desperate, deceptive tactics like this one to spread misinformation and lies," said John Bisognano, president of the NDRC. "There is no confusion. President Obama endorses voting YES to stop Trump and his MAGA allies from rigging our elections and to protect the rights and voting power of the American people ahead of the midterms."

One of the mailers features an image of Obama along with the quote, "For too long, gerrymandering has contributed to stalled progress and warped our representative government," reported the Virginia Mercury.

While characterized by the NDRC and the NAACP Virginia State Conference as so-called misinformation, the Obama quote is indeed genuine — and its context is damning.

RELATED: Red-state inaction is the soft underbelly of border politics

Scott Olson/Getty Images

Obama wrote in a July 8, 2020, post on X, "For too long, gerrymandering has contributed to stalled progress and warped our representative government. Redistricting begins next year — let’s all do our part to protect and restore our democracy."

Obama then urged Americans to join him "in the fight for fair maps" — specifically to support a possible constitutional amendment that would curb gerrymandering.

In the video accompanying the former president's 2020 post, Obama states, "Gerrymandering is a sneaky way for politicians to consolidate as much power as they can."

Another activist featured in the video adds, "Gerrymandering is when politicians manipulate the maps in order to predetermine the outcome so that it benefits one side over the other."

'Barack Obama, Abigail Spanberger, and others have already spoken against this kind of gerrymandering.'

Eric Holder, former President Obama's scandal-plagued attorney general, notes in the video that "you see the greatest amount of voter suppression when you see the greatest amount of gerrymandering."

Desperate to secure a majority in the U.S. House in the midterm elections, Obama and Democrats have jettisoned their supposedly principled stance from yesteryear and are now speaking out of the other side of their mouths.

Obama, specifically, is supporting the "yes" campaign.

In addition to featuring in a video championing Democrat gerrymandering, he stated last month, "Several Republican-controlled states have redrawn their congressional maps to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterm elections. Now Virginia has a chance to help level the playing field."

The mailer that highlighted Obama's hypocrisy and urged voters to "Protect Minority Representation" was sent to Virginia voters last week by the Justice for Democracy PAC, reported the Virginia Independent News.

A similar graphic was reportedly texted to Virginia voters by the Democracy and Justice PAC — which, like Justice for Democracy, is chaired by former Virginia Del. A.C. Cordoza (R) — along with the following message, "President Barack Obama says 'For too long gerrymandering has contributed to our stalled progress and warped our representative government.' That's why it’s important next month to vote NO against Virginia’s redistricting effort."

As proponents of the gerrymandering initiative melted down over the sight of Obama in the opposition mailers, Cordoza said in a statement to CNN, "No one can refute the accuracy of the quotes we’re presenting. Barack Obama, Abigail Spanberger, and others have already spoken against this kind of gerrymandering — I’m simply reminding voters where they stood."

A Tazewell County judge ruled on Jan. 27 that the proposed constitutional amendment was unlawful. The Virginia Supreme Court then ruled last month that Virginians can still vote for it in the statewide April referendum, though the commonwealth high court may yet uphold the lower court's injunction.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump announces Iran war is 'nearing completion'



President Donald Trump has announced that Operation Epic Fury is "nearing completion" as the military operation against Iran approaches its fifth week.

During his address to the nation Wednesday night, Trump recapped the United States' progress in the region, aiming to reassure Americans that the conflict would soon draw to a close. Notably, Trump did not indicate whether the United States would put boots on the ground in the region.

'The hard part is done.'

Trump reiterated the objectives of the operation, including destroying Iran's air force and navy, debilitating its missile capabilities, and preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons.

"Tonight, I'm pleased to say that these core strategic objectives are nearing completion," Trump said. "As we celebrate this progress, we think especially of the 13 American warriors who have laid down their lives in this fight to prevent our children from ever having to face a nuclear Iran."

RELATED: Trump says Iran asked for a ceasefire — but the US has one major condition

Trump also echoed the updates he provided throughout the week, urging European allies burdened by the oil crisis to buy American oil and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz themselves.

"The hard part is done, so it should be easy," Trump said. "And in any event, when this conflict is over, the strait will open up naturally."

Although it is still unclear who in Iran the United States is negotiating with and the status of those negotiations, Trump said that he is on track to "get rid of a cancer that has long simmered."

"It's known as the nuclear Iran," Trump said. "And they didn't know what was coming. They never imagined it."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Former 'human rights' chief allegedly STOLE from George Floyd and homeless children charities in San Francisco



A woman tasked with the mission to defend human rights in San Francisco was stealing funds from a nonprofit for her personal enrichment, according to prosecutors.

Sheryl Davis. 57, was charged with 17 felony counts that included conflict of interest in a government contract, perjury, and misappropriating public funds.

Prosecutors said she misappropriated funds from a charity meant to benefit homeless children that received $3.5 million of city funds.

Authorities were tipped off by a whistleblower to Davis' alleged illegal activities, according to a press release from San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins.

Davis was in charge of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars from the Dream Keeper Initiative but allegedly funneled the cash to companies where she could personally benefit. The program was meant to invest in the African-American community after the rioting over the death of George Floyd.

Prosecutors said she misappropriated funds from a charity meant to benefit homeless children that received $3.5 million of city funds. The organization paid Davis' son about $140,000, which was "deposited into a bank account Ms. Davis jointly owned and controlled."

Other numerous schemes were outlined by prosecutors in which Davis and 65-year-old James Spingola, a co-conspirator who ran a San Francisco nonprofit, allegedly misappropriated funds for their own benefit.

Spingola was charged with four felony counts of aiding and abetting Davis' conflict of interest in four contracts with the city.

Both Davis and Spingola were arrested on Monday and were booked into the San Francisco County Jail and given a $50,000 bond each.

Davis was fired in 2024 after it was discovered that she was living with Spingola without disclosing the relationship with the grant recipient. She was also accused of misusing funds at that time. The job paid $350,000 a year when she was fired.

RELATED: BLM activist named 'Bostonian of the Year' ordered to repay money she embezzled from taxpayers and nonprofit

"These are not routine charges," Jenkins said. "But I want to be clear: These are allegations that will ultimately be proven or disproven in court."

Prosecutors say Davis may face additional charges. The investigation into her alleged misconduct involved more than 50 search warrants and spanned over 18 months.

"We have charged what we believe we had the evidence to prove," Jenkins added.

Davis posted an odd message after the arrest on her social media account.

"Where are my encouraging and supportive sisters?" she asked.

Her attorney denied that she was guilty of any felonious conduct.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Illegal alien 'sicko' accused of possessing 50+ child porn images — ICE urges county to honor detainer



Immigration and Customs Enforcement is urging Dallas County to honor a detainer request lodged against an illegal alien accused of possessing child pornography, according to a press release exclusively obtained by Blaze News.

Orvin Bayardo Fuentes Borjas, 24, was arrested by the Irving Police Department and booked into the Dallas County jail system on March 6 after he was charged with possession of child pornography — over 50 visual depictions, a first-degree felony.

'Every single day, ICE is working to remove criminal illegal aliens like this sicko arrested for possession of 50 child pornography images.'

Fuentes Borjas' bond was set at $100,000.

The Irving Journal, a local news outlet, reported that a tip about Fuentes Borjas' alleged online activity led to his arrest.

A press release from the Department of Homeland Security revealed that ICE issued an arrest detainer against Fuentes Borjas. ICE is urging Dallas County not to release the suspect from local custody to allow agents time to transfer him to federal custody.

RELATED: Heroic ICE agent miraculously saves unresponsive child in TSA line

Orvin Bayardo Fuentes Borjas. Image source: Dallas County

The DHS described Fuentes Borjas as an illegal alien from Honduras.

"He was booked into Dallas County Jail, where he will remain until ICE takes him into custody," the agency wrote.

The DHS claimed that the suspect previously failed to show up for his immigration hearing and was issued a final order of removal on February 3, 2020.

RELATED: Why I support ICE as the son of an immigrant

Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg/Getty Images

"Every single day, ICE is working to remove criminal illegal aliens like this sicko arrested for possession of 50 child pornography images. ICE asked Dallas to not release this pedophile from jail back into Texas communities," DHS acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said.

Bis stated that under President Donald Trump and DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin's leadership, "ICE law enforcement will not allow criminal illegal aliens to prey on innocent children."

The Dallas County Sheriff's Office does not participate in ICE's 287(g) partnership program, according to ICE's website. However, Texas law requires law enforcement agencies to comply with ICE detainer requests.

“To keep predators like these out of our communities, it is imperative that local law enforcement works with ICE — Irving did its job here, but more must be done to ramp up removals. Municipalities across the board participating in the 287(g) Task Force program would be the surest way to make that a reality,” Irving City Council member Luis Canosa told Blaze News.

The Irving Police Department declined to comment. The Dallas County Sheriff's Office did not respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Foul-mouthed Democrat congresswoman doubles down on now-deleted profane tirade



Democrat Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada took to social media earlier this week to post an ill-tempered tirade filled with profanity.

Lee let out a flurry of F-words in response to an article detailing President Donald Trump's plans to attend the Supreme Court's oral arguments on a landmark birthright citizenship case. Notably, Lee's profile banner on X brands her as "America' #1 Most Bipartisan Member of Congress."

'Clearly my language touched a nerve.'

"So f**king f**ked up," Lee said in a now-deleted post with a timestamp of 1:03 a.m. Wednesday. "I'll pray they f**k him to his face. Sorry, I say f**k a lot these days."

Rather than apologizing for her low impulse control, Lee doubled down and defended her incoherent rant, claiming Trump has violated the Constitution and its separation of powers.

RELATED: SCOTUS asks pointed questions as fate of Trump's birthright citizenship order hangs in the balance

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty Images

"Clearly my language touched a nerve — my nerve was touched by the attacks on our Constitution and its separation of powers," Lee said in a post later that morning. "I took an oath to protect and defend it."

Administration officials and allies of the president mocked Lee's lack of professionalism, insinuating she has a drinking problem that contributed to her lack of online inhibition.

Brandon Herrera, a Republican congressional candidate from Texas, piled on to the ratio on Lee's childish follow-up post.

"I’m gonna need you to take an oath to stop swearing until you get good at it," Herrera said in a post on X. "Currently you sound like a 9 year old trying to impress the older kids."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump takes action to secure elections against voter fraud — Democrats already plan to shut it down



President Donald Trump has taken action to implement new policies to shut down mail-in voting fraud, and Democrats have wasted no time in announcing efforts to oppose it.

Trump signed an executive order Tuesday that directs the secretary of Homeland Security, with the aid of the Social Security Administration, to compile a list of U.S. citizens in each state who are eligible to vote.

'The American people sent him back to the White House because they overwhelmingly supported his commonsense election integrity agenda.'

The order further asks the U.S. Postal Service to adjust its rules and send ballots only to people on the voter list for each state and that all mail-in ballots be sent in secure envelopes that include a unique tracking barcode.

Each state will receive a list of the eligible voters no fewer than 60 days prior to each regularly scheduled federal election. The order also directs the U.S. attorney general to prioritize investigating and possibly prosecuting anyone — including state and local officials, public and private entities, and individuals — involved in sending ballots to ineligible voters.

Democrats immediately accused the president of infringing on Americans' right to vote with the order as well as the right of states to run their elections.

"This is another desperate, illegal power grab that shows a total lack of respect for the American people and our Constitution," read a statement from Oregon State Secretary Tobias Read.

"The Constitution is clear: states run elections. Oregon’s gold standard vote-by-mail elections are secure, fair, and accurate," he added. "We don’t need decrees from Washington, D.C. My message to the president: We’ll see you in court."

"This Executive Order is a disgusting overreach from the federal government and shows how little the Trump administration understands about election administration," said Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes (D). Fontes likewise pledged to take Trump to court over the EO.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson released a statement to the Daily Caller about the order.

"Election integrity has always been a top priority for President Trump, and the American people sent him back to the White House because they overwhelmingly supported his commonsense election integrity agenda," she said.

Congress is currently debating the SAVE Act, also called the SAVE America Act, which would require voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. Democrats have promised to vehemently oppose the bill's passage.

"The president will do everything in his power to defend the safety and security of American elections and to ensure that only American citizens are voting in them," Jackson added. "Congress should also expeditiously pass President Trump’s SAVE America Act to protect elections for generations to come."

RELATED: 'Dead on arrival': Chuck Schumer says Dems will 'go all out' to defeat voter ID bill

The president has threatened to veto any other bill the Congress passes until the SAVE Act is passed.

"It must be done immediately. It supersedes everything else," he wrote on social media earlier this month.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

SCOTUS asks pointed questions as fate of Trump's birthright citizenship order hangs in the balance



The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in the case challenging President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship.

Trump made history by being the first sitting president to attend a SCOTUS hearing. He attended for over an hour, departing shortly after the solicitor general, John Sauer, concluded his arguments.

'Why put it in if it's irrelevant?'

Shortly after noon on Wednesday, Trump wrote in a post on social media, "We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow 'Birthright' Citizenship!"

Sauer previously claimed that lower-court rulings finding Trump's executive order unconstitutional were overly broad and incorrectly held that "birth on U.S. territory confers citizenship on anyone subject to the regulatory reach of U.S. law."

During Wednesday's arguments, Sauer contended that the 14th Amendment phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" requires parents of a child to be domiciled in the U.S. and have allegiance to it.

He explained that the citizenship clause was enacted after the Civil War to grant citizenship to freed slaves and their children whose allegiance to the U.S. "had been established by generations of domicile here."

RELATED: Trump makes history at SCOTUS birthright citizenship hearing

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

"It did not grant citizenship to the children of temporary visitors or illegal aliens who have no such allegiance. This conclusion reflects the original public meaning of the clause," he stated.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts called Sauer’s argument “very quirky.”

"Well, starting with that theory, you obviously put a lot of weight on 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'" Roberts stated. "But the examples you give to support that strike me as very quirky."

"Children of ambassadors, children of enemies during a hostile invasion, children on warships," Roberts continued. "And then you expand it to a whole class of, illegal aliens are here in the country. I'm not quite sure how you can get to that big group from such tiny and sort of idiosyncratic examples."

Sauer argued that birthright citizenship has generated "a sprawling industry of birth tourism," adding that "uncounted thousands of foreigners from potentially hostile nations have flocked to give birth in the United States."

American Civil Liberties Union legal director Cecillia Wang argued before SCOTUS against Trump's executive order.

Wang was pressed about U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, an 1898 Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that a child born in the U.S. to Chinese citizen parents was an American citizen. While the ruling set the precedent for anyone born in the U.S., Ark's parents were both legally domiciled in the U.S.

"Thirty years after ratification, this court held that the 14th Amendment embodies the English common law rule," Wang stated during Wednesday's hearing. "Virtually everyone born on U.S. soil is subject to its jurisdiction and is a citizen."

"The majority tells us six times in the opinion that domicile is irrelevant under common law," Wang added.

RELATED: SCOTUS gives Trump a unanimous victory on persecution claims in asylum cases

Kent Nishimura/AFP/Getty Images

Justice Samuel Alito pushed back on Wang's arguments, stating that he "might agree" with her "if 'domicile' had simply been sprinkled in the opinion," though it appeared 20 times.

"Why put it in if it's irrelevant?" Alito asked Wang.

"The first is that, again, it was a stipulated fact," Wang responded. "The second is that regardless of what the judgment in the case was … the rule of decision in Wong Kim Ark has binding precedential effect. Even if you think that Wong Kim Ark decided the case based on the stipulated facts, you have to follow that controlling rule of decision. And if you follow that rule, you get to the same result."

Justice Elena Kagan appeared to share Alito's concern, stating, "What are those 20 'domicile' words doing there? You can take some of them and say, 'I don't know; they were just summarizing the facts of the case,' but not all of them."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'We’re gonna hang him from the Statue of Liberty': ANOTHER man arrested for alleged threats to kill Trump



A Massachusetts man was arrested for allegedly making threats to kill President Donald Trump and "hang him" from the Statue of Liberty.

The alleged messages from May 2025 to July 2025 were posted to the Facebook account of Andrew D. Emerald of Great Barrington, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts.

'We’re gonna hang him from the Statue of Liberty until his pathetic bloated corpse rots off falls in the ocean.'

Emerald was arrested Wednesday morning and is scheduled to appear in court later in the day.

The press release included the eight posts that he allegedly made.

"When I see to it that Trump is put to death. It will be the the day the purpose creation put me here for beyond creating. My daughter is fulfilled. (because what she is destined to do for the world is far greater than mine, taking out the orange menace!)" read an alleged post on May 3.

"Cause and effect. Trump being a monster to humanity caused this family suffering, and they might never choose to have children because of him Affect we’re going to f****** kill Trump on public television so the world sees what we do to f****** monsters and then we’re gonna hang him from the Statue of Liberty until his pathetic bloated corpse rots off falls in the ocean," read an alleged post from May 15.

In other alleged posts, he threatened to burn down Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence and claimed to have burned down a home previously.

RELATED: Man served time for threatening to kill Trump — then gets arrested for more alleged threats

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Emerald was charged with eight counts of interstate transmission of threatening communications, which carries a sentence of up to five years in prison, if convicted.

The charge also carries a possible sentence of three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Reactions to SCOTUS ruling on conversion therapy come pouring in



In a case with potential far-reaching consequences in states with similar laws, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting, that a Colorado law banning conversion therapy for minors was unconstitutional.

The case, Chiles v. Salazar, has gained a wide mix of reactions from think tanks, politicians, and media personalities alike.

'They believe it is more natural for a man to be a woman than for a man to be a man.'

Blaze News previously reported that the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh ripped into Jackson's dissent, saying that her opinion "just proves again that she is the most unfit, unqualified, unhinged lunatic to ever hold a seat on the Supreme Court."

Others celebrated the positive aspects of the case, touting the decision as a win for all of the victims who have been caught in the crosshairs of gender ideology.

RELATED: SCOTUS rules on law banning 'conversion therapy' — and 2 liberal justices break rank

DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images

Terry Schilling, the president of the American Principles Project, told Blaze News, "The Supreme Court delivered a landmark victory for religious believers, parents, and, most importantly, vulnerable children. Colorado Democrats have shown they will stomp on the rights of anyone who stands in the way of the well-heeled gay and transgender lobby whether it is bakers, doctors, or desperate families."

"It should not take the lengthy legal battles or the Supreme Court to rein in the liberal war against reality. That is why fed-up Colorado families are appealing straight to voters to protect children from extremist Democrats," Schilling continued.

Ashley McGuire, author, radio host, and senior fellow at the Catholic Association, likewise showered the Supreme Court's decision with praise.

In a statement to Blaze News, McGuire said, "Efforts by left-wing ideologues to force health care professionals to violate their personal and religious beliefs have failed again. We applaud the Supreme Court's decision to protect the religious liberty and free speech rights of therapists in today's 8-1 ruling in the case of Chiles v. Salazar. This ruling also protects vulnerable children and upholds the rights of parents to seek care for their children in line with their personal beliefs."

The ruling is primarily a First Amendment case, which, notably, does not issue any opinion or ruling on the efficacy, morality, or legality of so-called conversion therapy itself, defined in the ruling as any treatments or attempts "to change an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity."

The issue, in simple terms, was that the law forced the plaintiff and other counselors who deal in the relevant field to adopt an affirming approach to minor patients who may have been confused about their sexual orientation or gender identity and were seeking to change it.

BlazeTV's Daniel Horowitz summed up this issue in a statement shared with Blaze News:

It is shocking how it has taken years to affirm such a basic right as two adults contracting with each other to engage in verbal therapy to affirm natural sexuality. It is even more shocking how the left believes a doctor can pursue a physical action to unnaturally change gender with castration, but you are banned from merely speaking with someone in support of their existing natural sexuality. They believe it is more natural for a man to be a woman than for a man to be a man. Their understanding of authentic individual rights as it intersects with governmental powers is as perfectly corrupted as one can imagine.

Democratic leaders, on the other hand, expressed their disapproval of the decision. In a reply to the Associated Press' report on X, California Governor Gavin Newsom said, "Conversion therapy is discredited junk science that inflicts harm on LGBTQ youth. The Supreme Court's decision is disappointing and puts vulnerable kids at risk."

On a lighter note, some social media users pointed out the humor of this decision being released on the so-called Transgender Day of Visibility, March 31.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!